Bark
03-22 09:34 AM
My apologies for posting this to the wrong section of the forum. Hopefully you will forgive a newbie. Bark
wallpaper teenage hairstyles
makemygc
07-09 10:03 PM
Greeting Cards :p
Now that we have media attention with USCIS we should start letting Congress know of our plight too. Vice President who I think is the chair of the senate and Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker.:D
Adding whackiness to it. How about creating just one big huge monster greeting card with all the signatures from affecting people and put it in front of white house or some place we get the attention.
Now that we have media attention with USCIS we should start letting Congress know of our plight too. Vice President who I think is the chair of the senate and Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker.:D
Adding whackiness to it. How about creating just one big huge monster greeting card with all the signatures from affecting people and put it in front of white house or some place we get the attention.
coopheal
12-30 03:17 PM
5. I will pay IV at least $5.00 a month
Change it to
5. I will pay IV at least $50 a month
Change it to
5. I will pay IV at least $50 a month
2011 Short Teen Hairstyles
pani_6
07-02 12:11 AM
Are you emrolled in Emba in Berkely..the cost seems rather high for most mba's 80 K average
more...
ameerka_dream
03-30 09:40 AM
^^^^^^^^^^bump^^^^^^^^^^
Macaca
05-25 08:10 PM
Making History, Reluctantly (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/24/AR2007052402069.html) In a Hill Anomaly, Pelosi Shepherds Iraq Bill She Opposes, By Jonathan Weisman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/jonathan+weisman/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, May 25, 2007
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
In public, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had done nothing to suppress her frustration as she assented to funding the Iraq war without a deadline to end it. But behind closed doors Wednesday night, she was all business.
With its members gathered in her office, she told the House's "Progressive Caucus" that she would vote against the war funding bill, but that she also had no choice but to facilitate its passage. Funds were running out for the troops, and she had promised to protect them. The Memorial Day break loomed, and without the money President Bush would have a week to hammer her party for taking a vacation while the Pentagon scrambled to keep its soldiers fed.
Was she agonized over the situation? Sure, said Rep. Maurice D. Hinchey (D-N.Y.), who attended the meeting. But "we all feel that way," he added. "I feel that way, too. Are we going to just walk away now, or are we going to continue this process, to keep the pressure on?"
Yesterday's vote to fund the war through September was a historical rarity: the passage of a bill opposed by the speaker of the House and a majority of the speaker's party.
Two years ago to the day, then-Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) violated the "Hastert rule" -- that only bills supported by a majority of the majority can come up -- by bringing up legislation to allow federal funding for stem cell research. The majority of the Republican majority opposed the law. He voted against it, but he knew it would never become law over President Bush's signature.
Over his objections and the opposition of most Republicans, Hastert did allow passage of campaign finance reform in 2002, but only because a petition drive was about to force the bill to the floor. The North American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1993, over the objections of most Democrats, who were then in the majority. But NAFTA did have the support of then-Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-Wash.), as well as the Democratic president, Bill Clinton.
In contrast, the Iraq funding bill was not only opposed by the majority of House Democrats, it was also ardently opposed by the speaker and even the lawmaker who drafted it, Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.). And it is destined to become law.
"We don't relish bringing a package to the floor that we're not going to vote for," Obey conceded before last night's vote.
Pelosi's agonized decision put her in the company of Foley, who in 1991 brought to the floor the resolution authorizing the Persian Gulf War and then voted against it, and Thomas Brackett Reed, a speaker in the 1890s who voted against the annexation of Hawaii, and then against the Spanish-American War, but allowed both to go forward.
"To have the chairman and the speaker vote against a bill like this, I've never heard of it," Hastert said.
But while protesters outside the Capitol condemned what they saw as a capitulation, Democrats inside were remarkably understanding of their speaker's contortions.
Party leaders jury-rigged the votes yesterday to give all Democrats something to brag about. A parliamentary vote to bring the Iraq funding legislation to the floor included language demanding a showdown vote in September over further funding. A second vote allowed Democrats to vote in favor of funds for Gulf Coast hurricane recovery, agricultural drought relief and children's health insurance. Finally, the House got around to funding the war.
Republicans cried foul over what they saw as an abuse of the legislative system, but Democrats saw brilliance in the legerdemain. And with such contortions came more appreciation for the efforts Pelosi was making to fund the war in a fashion most palatable to angry Democrats.
"It was the responsible thing to do, and she's a responsible speaker," said Rep. Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), who is personally close to Pelosi. "You can't just walk away."
more...
cfa
05-16 08:42 PM
Any cfas here?. I am looking for some advice on the sponsorship. Please post if you are knowledgeable about cfa program. thanks
2010 hot hairstyles for teenage
Quirky Quantum
10-27 10:39 PM
Added :)
I actually can't even see the highlight!
Yes, that'd be the problem:lol:
I actually can't even see the highlight!
Yes, that'd be the problem:lol:
more...
sareesh
10-29 01:16 PM
Hello All,
My I-140 was approved on 10/08/2008. But I am not sure if it is EB2 or EB3.
My labor was filed with MS + 2years but My I-140 Notice Type says:
Skilled Worker or Professinal, Sec 203(b) (3) (A) (i) or (ii).
I will appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,
SG
My I-140 was approved on 10/08/2008. But I am not sure if it is EB2 or EB3.
My labor was filed with MS + 2years but My I-140 Notice Type says:
Skilled Worker or Professinal, Sec 203(b) (3) (A) (i) or (ii).
I will appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,
SG
hair Teen trend hairstyles!
Syko171
03-01 01:45 PM
Suit yourself...
I would do it in 3DSMAX cuz in swift it's much harder to do it...
(almost) Everything is possible if you have the right skills...
You asked ...or does all that need to be done in 3ds...
No matter where you do it as long as it can be exported to an swf.
I would do it in 3DSMAX cuz in swift it's much harder to do it...
(almost) Everything is possible if you have the right skills...
You asked ...or does all that need to be done in 3ds...
No matter where you do it as long as it can be exported to an swf.
more...
smehta1
06-05 11:37 PM
http://www.time.com/time/cartoonsoftheweek/0,29489,1625658_1371878,00.html
hot emo hairstyles for short hair
va_217
01-11 10:38 AM
Say am planning to stay abroad after filing 485 for more than 6 months and the consulting company is willing to support.
what can be the possible issues if stayed like an year or more if I am maintaining H1 status instead of using AP
what can be the possible issues if stayed like an year or more if I am maintaining H1 status instead of using AP
more...
house Here are some Teen Hairstyles
visli_com
03-12 05:27 PM
Hi Guys
My I-140 cleared on last month, also I applied for 3 year's visa extension, got receipt. Now I want to change company, I got a got offer from a big company. My question is
1. If I'll apply H1-b from new company , how many years visa I'll get(With current I-140)?
2. Is it possible to keep PD of my current GC (Aug'03)? even in case of my current company revoke/use my GC?
Thanks.
My I-140 cleared on last month, also I applied for 3 year's visa extension, got receipt. Now I want to change company, I got a got offer from a big company. My question is
1. If I'll apply H1-b from new company , how many years visa I'll get(With current I-140)?
2. Is it possible to keep PD of my current GC (Aug'03)? even in case of my current company revoke/use my GC?
Thanks.
tattoo Then what kind of hairstyles
pappu
08-04 04:07 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/f_english.pdf
The post office cannot forward your card. If there is a name
other than yours on the mailbox you use to get your mail,
the post office will not deliver your card. In either of these situations,
they will return your card to us as undeliverable.
- If you move before you get your card, notify your post
office, but also call our customer service number to update
your address and emphasize when calling that you are waiting
for your card.
- If you are living with someone else, and that person’s
name is on the mailbox, we recommend you add your name
to the mailbox, or you run the risk the post office will return
your card to us as undeliverable
Something I found on USCIS site. Not sure if it applied to just the greencard or the EAD card as well. But this is a good tip.
The post office cannot forward your card. If there is a name
other than yours on the mailbox you use to get your mail,
the post office will not deliver your card. In either of these situations,
they will return your card to us as undeliverable.
- If you move before you get your card, notify your post
office, but also call our customer service number to update
your address and emphasize when calling that you are waiting
for your card.
- If you are living with someone else, and that person’s
name is on the mailbox, we recommend you add your name
to the mailbox, or you run the risk the post office will return
your card to us as undeliverable
Something I found on USCIS site. Not sure if it applied to just the greencard or the EAD card as well. But this is a good tip.
more...
pictures teenage hairstyles 2008
saveimmigration
06-11 09:31 PM
FROM USCIS
Fact Sheet: USCIS Offers Premium Processing Service for Certain Form I-140 Petitions Starting June 16, 2008
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will make available Premium Processing Service for designated Form I-140 petitions1 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker) filed for alien workers in H-1B nonimmigrant status who are reaching the end of their sixth year in H-1B nonimmigrant status. Starting on June 16, 2008, USCIS will begin accepting Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, for Forms I-140 filed for alien beneficiaries who, as of the date of filing the Form I-907:
* Are currently in H-1B nonimmigrant status;
* Will reach the end of their 6th year of their H-1B nonimmigrant stay in 60 days;
* Are only eligible for a further H-1B extension under AC21 �104(c)2 upon approval of their Form I-140 petition; and
* Are ineligible to extend their H-1B status under AC21 �106(a)3.
Fact Sheet: USCIS Offers Premium Processing Service for Certain Form I-140 Petitions Starting June 16, 2008
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will make available Premium Processing Service for designated Form I-140 petitions1 (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker) filed for alien workers in H-1B nonimmigrant status who are reaching the end of their sixth year in H-1B nonimmigrant status. Starting on June 16, 2008, USCIS will begin accepting Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service, for Forms I-140 filed for alien beneficiaries who, as of the date of filing the Form I-907:
* Are currently in H-1B nonimmigrant status;
* Will reach the end of their 6th year of their H-1B nonimmigrant stay in 60 days;
* Are only eligible for a further H-1B extension under AC21 �104(c)2 upon approval of their Form I-140 petition; and
* Are ineligible to extend their H-1B status under AC21 �106(a)3.
dresses Teens 2009 Teen Hairstyles
excogitator
07-14 03:50 AM
Hi All,
Created this one for the contest. Anyone want to get teleported to fantasy land?
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7664/mysticalorange.jpg
Enjoy!!!
Created this one for the contest. Anyone want to get teleported to fantasy land?
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/7664/mysticalorange.jpg
Enjoy!!!
more...
makeup Tagged with: teen hairstyles,
thakkarbhav
08-10 12:51 PM
Embassy of the United States of America in Manila (http://manila.usembassy.gov/wwwh3023.html)
girlfriend quot;popular teen hair stylesquot;
ewiebe
04-08 04:37 AM
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-demo-3d-cube-cd5396f1-df2a-40e3-9310-5d224ecba404
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-automotive-overview-demo-2cff76d1-9142-4720-a991-5cee92078318
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-demo-3d-cube-cd5396f1-df2a-40e3-9310-5d224ecba404
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-automotive-overview-demo-2cff76d1-9142-4720-a991-5cee92078318
hairstyles Teenage Girl Hairstyles in
ishreeram
03-13 08:04 AM
If you don't file a G-28 alongwith your renewal, it's implied that you are renewing without a lawyer.
drirshad
08-09 03:29 AM
You must submit the 485 through a lawyer if your priority is current, check the visa bulletin. You can always file when 140 is approved and you are still employed with same employer. You can also file EAD & AP for work permit and international travel. Get a lawyer asap.
Ann Ruben
01-20 08:50 AM
An I-140 petition filed for you by your current employer will have no impact on the pending I-140 appeal filed by your future employer.
No comments:
Post a Comment